There was a time when nothing mattered more than having the right shoes.
For me, that meant lacing up a pair of Adidas Superstars — those classic white kicks with the black stripes and rubber shell toe.
They were the status symbol at school, on the field, and basically anywhere cool kids existed.
I didn’t just have one pair. I had two. Maybe three. And I wore them until the soles wore thin and the stripes faded into nostalgia. Adidas wasn’t just a brand…it was a personality trait.
Related: Lululemon’s latest viral product reveals something much bigger
So yeah, it’s a little jarring to see the company now at the center of a very different kind of headline.
One that accuses the sportswear giant of going way beyond street style dominance into intimidation tactics, according to a federal court filing submitted on May 21, 2025.
The allegations come from a competing footwear company, which claims Adidas has used threats and pressure to scare smaller players off the court.
The language in the lawsuit doesn’t hold back.
The latest lawsuit against Adidas paints a dark picture.
Image source: Stache/AFP via Getty Images
Adidas hit with explosive legal filing
The filing accuses Adidas (ADDDF) of manipulating the legal system to block competitors from dropping anything even remotely resembling its sneaker lineup.
The lawsuit frames Adidas’s conduct as an aggressive use of legal threats to shut down fair competition.
While it doesn’t use the word “bully” directly, it accuses the brand of overreaching and manipulating trademark law to pressure rivals. Less trademark defense, more corporate chokehold.
The suit was filed by Steve Madden (SHOO) , the fashion-forward footwear brand known for its trend-driven styles.
According to the complaint, Adidas has turned its iconic three-stripe trademark into a legal sledgehammer, swinging it at rivals over design elements that aren’t identical and arguably not even close.
Related: Nike’s house is not in order, and customers may pay the price
Steve Madden’s lawyers say this isn’t about protecting a logo…it’s about choking out competition.
Trademark law exists to prevent confusion, not to lock up every design with a vaguely athletic vibe.
And while it’s totally fair for Adidas to protect its brand, experts say this case could expose a pattern that leans more corporate strong-arm than fair play.
Because in 2025, one bad move can spark a viral backlash before lunch.
What this means for Adidas and the sneaker industry
Let’s be honest: this lawsuit couldn’t come at a worse time for Adidas.
The company is still limping from its messy Yeezy breakup — a split that left it with over a billion dollars’ worth of unsold inventory and a bruised brand.
Meanwhile, Nike’s still the king (for now), and new players like On and Hoka are steadily chewing through market share.
Adidas has been banking on its legacy and aggressive branding to hold the line. But if this legal strategy is revealed to be more intimidation than innovation, it could seriously dent the company’s street cred.
Because today’s shoppers want transparency. They want brands that play fair. And nothing kills nostalgia faster than finding out your childhood favorite might be using lawsuits like a flex.
If the claims stick, Adidas could be in for more than just courtroom drama. A hit to its reputation won’t be easy to shake.
Not even with a throwback drop or collab-of-the-moment.
For those of us who once wore Superstars like a badge of cool, this isn’t just disappointing. It’s personal.
Related: Nike turns to unexpected brand in desperate bid to win back Gen Z
