Earlier this month, a fallen tech stock started to rise on an unexpected catalyst.
Intel, (INTC) had been cast aside by many experts who see it as a relic of a former era, a company that proved unable to innovate at a pivotal time and that joined the artificial intelligence (AI) race too late. But two stronger companies have recently expressed interest in acquiring parts of Intel’s business.
💰💸 Don’t miss the move: SIGN UP for TheStreet’s FREE Daily newsletter 💰💸
The prospect of offers from both Broadcom (AVGO) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM) could certainly help Intel, which has struggled significantly over the past year, with shares declining more than 40%. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean it is best for the United States, specifically for its AI industry.
Multiple experts recently speculated that Taiwan Semiconductor taking over Intel’s plants could prove highly problematic. However, they see a way for the struggling company to move forward.
President Donald Trump has reportedly pressured Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company to make a deal with Intel.
TheStreet
Taiwan Semiconductor may not be the savior that Intel needs
Both TSM and Broadcom have contributed to Intel’s decline over the past few years, undermining its former strength both in integrated design and chip manufacturing. As Intel struggled to innovate in a rapidly changing market, other companies moved faster and procured bigger pieces of both markets, leaving the former leader in a precarious position.
Related: Two major tech leaders consider shaking things up at Intel
With Broadcom considering purchasing Intel’s chip design business and Taiwan Semiconductor looking to purchase its factory facilities, the company found itself in the national spotlight. This has continued since then, partially due to reports that the Taiwanese chipmaker’s interest is due to pressure from President Donald Trump.
In an article recently published by Fortune, professors David B. Yoffie and James Plummer, nonprofit leader Reed Hundt and former U.S. trade representative Charlene Barshefsky examined this development, noting that “Intel’s technology is at least a generation behind TSMC” and therefore, it may not make sense for the company to make a deal.
“Why would TSMC buy this network—this long, heavy ball and chain?” The authors ask. “Presumably only if the United States government pressured it to do so, perhaps holding Taiwan hostage to America’s defense capabilities.”
They add that this might not benefit the U.S. as Trump likely envisions, speculating that even in the event of a deal being reached between the two companies, Taiwan Semiconductor would likely keep its leading-edge research and manufacturing would remain in its base country.
Anthropic CEO issues frightening warning on Chinese AI rivalAnalyst who predicted Palantir rally picks best AI software stocksElon Musk’s latest move shocks tech world
The authors provide two reasons why such an outcome would not be in America’s best interests, stating “First, a world-leading Western chipmaker has to have its research arm located in the U.S. or the West, not Taiwan. Second, granting what, in effect, is a global monopoly in advanced chip manufacturing to TSMC would be a devastating blow down the road to America’s world-leading design firms.”
How can this problem be solved? Experts provide a possible solution
In the article, the authors also highlight Intel’s past as a dominant tech manufacturer, noting that the U.S. should be careful not to cede its dominance in the AI chip manufacturing industry to TSMC, even if the company is exploring expanding its U.S. reach.
Related: Microsoft takes action to fight for major tech policy change
As they see it, there is one correct way to address the problems facing Intel and it does not involve TSMC. “The United States government should demand that Intel’s board separate the manufacturing business, which can only be sold to a U.S. or Western consortium of private sector investors,” they advise.
The authors add that to incentivize a private sector investor to take on this massive undertaking, the U.S. government should “provide roughly $10 billion of capital” structured as nonvoting equity so that taxpayers can benefit.
They conclude by praising TSMC as a world-class company but highlighting that while “competition with it is in the best interest of the whole globe” helping an international firm gain a monopoly over the AI chip industry will not be good for the U.S. or its tech sector.
Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast
