AT&T has spent years telling investors the same story. Build more fiber, build a stronger wireless network, and the payoff will come. 

For a while, Wall Street bought it. The telecom stock held up even as rivals stumbled, and management kept pointing to 2030 as the finish line for its buildout.

Now one of the firms that used to be on board is stepping back. And the reason has less to do with AT&T’s (T) own execution and more to do with what’s happening thousands of miles above it.

Oppenheimer cuts its AT&T stock rating

Oppenheimer downgraded AT&T from “Outperform” to “Perform,” according to a report from Stocks to Trade. The move signals the firm no longer expects the stock to outperform the broader market, a meaningful shift for a name that had been one of its preferred telecom picks.

The reasoning centers on low Earth orbit satellite networks. Oppenheimer told clients that these constellations represent a structural threat to AT&T’s long-term broadband and mobile subscriber growth, not just a short-term distraction. 

The firm also grew more skeptical about AT&T’s fiber math. Management has publicly stated a goal of reaching more than 60 million fiber locations by 2030. Oppenheimer now expects penetration to fall short of that goal and thinks AT&T may top out closer to 50 million homes. 

Related: Verizon, AT&T suffer major customer data setback

Slower fiber growth typically means softer subscriber additions and pressure on ARPU, the average revenue a company pulls in per customer. Oppenheimer expects both to weaken, and that expectation has already weighed on the stock. 

The real trigger behind the downgrade is Starlink. Elon Musk‘s satellite company is reportedly weighing a move into a direct-to-consumer mobile service in the United States, possibly built on its own terrestrial network. 

If that happens, it would create a brand-new nationwide competitor standing alongside Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile US. 

For a company that has spent tens of billions of dollars laying fiber and buying spectrum on the assumption that physical infrastructure wins, a serious satellite competitor changes the calculation.

AT&T continues to invest heavily in fiber.

Bloomberg/Getty Images

AT&T’s fiber bet, straight from management

To understand why this news landed hard, it helps to know how central fiber is to AT&T’s pitch.

CFO Pascal Desroches told investors at the Mizuho Technology Conference on June 9 that AT&T expects to end the year around 40 million fiber passings, on a path to more than 60 million by 2030. 

He called convergence, selling fiber and wireless to the same household, the company’s “winning hand,” pointing to lower churn and higher lifetime value among bundled customers.

More Retail:

CEO John Stankey made a similar case at the JPMorgan technology conference in May, describing AT&T’s end state as “a metropolitan fiber business with a top-class national wireless footprint.” 

He also addressed satellite competition directly, saying AT&T views it as a complement rather than a replacement for fiber and wireless, and pointed to the company’s own direct-to-device joint venture with two other carriers as evidence AT&T is hedging that risk itself.

“We view satellite as very much a great complement to the existing products and services that we offer,” Stankey stated. “We’ve been building scaled quality networks that work in the home and work on the go for many, many decades and investing over a long period of time to make that happen.”

AT&T is betting its future on owning the physical pipes. Oppenheimer is now questioning whether that bet still has the runway it once did.

Is AT&T stock fundamentally sound?

Fiber and spectrum don’t come cheap, and AT&T’s recent financials show it. 

  • AT&T’s long-term debt climbed to $131.6 billion as of March 2026, up from $117.3 billion a year earlier. 
  • Total liabilities rose to $293.6 billion from $275.6 billion over the same stretch. 

Much of that increase traces back to the Lumen fiber acquisition and the pending EchoStar spectrum deal, both of which pushed net debt-to-adjusted EBITDA to roughly 2.71 times by the end of the first quarter, with management guiding toward 3.2 times once EchoStar closes.

Revenue reached $31.5 billion in the first quarter, up 2.9% from a year earlier, and EBITDA improved to $11.6 billion from $10.9 billion. 

Cash and equivalents grew sharply to $12 billion from $6.9 billion. But net income attributable to shareholders slipped to $3.8 billion from $4.4 billion, and diluted EPS fell to $0.54 from $0.61. 

Cash from operations also dipped to $7.56 billion for the quarter from $9.05 billion a year prior, while capital spending rose to $4.88 billion.

Taken together, AT&T looks like a company leaning more heavily on debt to fund growth at a time when profitability is softening slightly. 

Management has laid out a path back toward its 2.5x leverage target within roughly three years of EchoStar’s closing.

But it does mean AT&T has less room for error, and a credible new competitor is exactly the kind of error the balance sheet can’t easily absorb.

For now, AT&T insists its destiny is in its own hands and that it needs no further acquisitions to hit its targets.

Oppenheimer’s downgrade suggests the market should watch the sky as closely as the ground.

Related: AT&T launches 4 new internet plans amid fight for customers