Americans shopping for a Honda CR-V currently have an important choice.
They may spend at least $36,030 on a hybrid or $31,520 on the gasoline-powered vehicle. The least costly variants vary by $4,510, but the hybrid also has more equipment.
That option vanishes the next year.
Honda Motor (HMC) announced Nov. 12 that its redesigned 2028 CR-V will be powered exclusively by a hybrid engine.
One of the most popular family SUVs in America will no longer offer the traditional gasoline-only option.
Honda’s official announcement confirms the decision, along with plans for a new platform, updated styling and improved fuel efficiency.
In the end, the adjustment may save drivers money at the petrol pump. However, there is an issue for consumers who value affordability.
Will consumers who now choose the less costly gasoline variant be able to afford Honda’s upcoming CR-V? The firm has not yet disclosed the revamped SUV’s price.
Families that are thinking about making a purchase must decide whether to buy the current model or hold off until a possibly more effective successor is available.
Honda’s hybrid-only CR-V could change what buyers pay
The current 2027 Honda CR-V’s gasoline-powered LX with front-wheel drive begins at $31,520.
The Sport Hybrid, the least costly hybrid, is priced at $36,030. Honda’s $1,550 destination fee, taxes, and other costs are not included in either price.
Honda’s September pricing announcement confirms the figures.
Because the cars have different equipment and trim levels, the $4,510 difference isn’t solely due to the expense of hybrid technology. Furthermore, it does not imply that the new CR-V will cost $4,510 more.
Honda may launch a hybrid trim that is less costly and reduces the difference.
However, the new generation will not provide the simplicity or lower initial cost of a normal gasoline vehicle to consumers. Reduced fuel usage is one possible advantage.
The modern front-wheel-drive gasoline-powered CR-V has an EPA rating of 30 miles per gallon. The same hybrid with front-wheel drive gets 40 mpg.
Based on those evaluations, the hybrid takes around 25% less gasoline to go the same distance.
Annual mileage, gas costs, and driving practices all affect actual savings.
Long-distance drivers or long-term SUV owners may find that the reduced fuel costs somewhat balance the higher purchasing price.
However, a less expensive gasoline-powered car can make more financial sense for a family that drives comparatively few miles.
The beginning price of the forthcoming CR-V is important because of this.
Honda promises another improvement for its best-selling SUV
The revamped CR-V will not only use the current hybrid system in lieu of its gasoline engine.
Honda says the seventh-generation CR-V will introduce its fifth-generation two-motor hybrid system. For its next hybrid cars, the business hopes to increase fuel economy by over 10%.
More Automotive:
- BMW’s second profit warning of the year hit harder than the first
- Ford and GM see savings drivers may pay for later
- Ford stock rises as car buyers face a costly reality
Additionally, a brand-new electric all-wheel-drive system intended to increase traction and responsiveness is planned.
The SUV will be supported by a completely new chassis designed to save weight without sacrificing body strength. The upcoming CR-V may be more efficient and pleasurable to drive thanks to such modifications.
However, final costs, EPA fuel-economy ratings, and official horsepower numbers have not yet been made public. Buyers should be aware of another differential.
Plugging into an electrical socket is not necessary for the CR-V’s traditional hybrid system.
During regular driving, the battery is recharged by the gasoline engine and regenerative braking.
Honda’s hybrid vehicle guide explains how the system works. Honda is reacting to the increasing competition as well.
Toyota has already made its updated RAV4 fully hybrid, eliminating a significant rival’s gasoline-only model. Car and Driver reported that Honda’s decision follows the strategy Toyota adopted with the 2026 RAV4.
This means that two of the most well-known small SUVs in America are directly competing on hybrid efficiency, features, and cost.
If manufacturers put in more effort to improve fuel efficiency without raising costs too much, consumers may benefit from competition.
Honda’s $3 billion investment explains its bigger strategy
Honda’s decision isn’t limited to the CR-V. The company says hybrids already account for more than half of CR-V sales. And hybrid sales across its broader Honda lineup have been increasing.
For the third year in a row, the CR-V is expected to sell more than 400,000 units in the US.
These numbers contribute to Honda’s belief that it can do away with the gasoline-only model without alienating its core clientele.
Additionally, the business is investing heavily in manufacturing.
On Nov. 9, Honda announced plans for a $3 billion factory in Ohio, expected to create more than 2,000 jobs. Production is anticipated to start in 2029, subject to clearances, and the plant is built to manufacture up to 240,000 cars a year.
Honda’s manufacturing announcement also outlined investments in existing US factories to expand hybrid-engine and powertrain production.
That matters for investors because Honda is committing billions of dollars to hybrids rather than relying exclusively on fully electric vehicles.
It implies that the corporation anticipates gasoline-electric technology will continue to be significant for many years.
Stronger demand for hybrids does not, however, ensure that Honda can maintain reasonable costs. The eventual sticker price of the revised CR-V will depend on manufacturing costs, competition, and features.
The current gasoline CR-V is still a more affordable option for someone who needs a car right now.
The updated model offers improved technology and perhaps reduced fuel usage for a customer who is prepared to wait until 2027.
The cost is the missing component.
Honda is wagering that consumers will accept a CR-V that is exclusively hybrid. The real question could be whether they can afford its next generation.
Related: Ford and GM face a $5,000 SUV challenge from Volkswagen
